MARDELL MONROE VS. LANEISHA JOHNSON ET AL
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO To Amend Plaintiffs Complaint For Unlawful Detainer
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679155 - September 12, 2025 Hearing date: September 12, 2025 Case number: CUD25679155 Case title: MARDELL MONROE VS. LANEISHA JOHNSON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679155 | Case Title: | | MARDELL MONROE VS. LANEISHA JOHNSON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-12 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO To Amend Plaintiffs Complaint For Unlawful Detainer | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Sept 12, 2025. Line 10.
PLAINTIFF MARDELL MONROE TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF ADELL AND HELEN SHEPARD TRUST MOTION FOR LEAVE TO To Amend Plaintiffs Complaint For Unlawful Detainer is GRANTED. No opposition filed. Plaintiff to file the First Amended Complaint forthwith. =(501/SKF)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”