DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679053·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 11 months agoCONTINUED

CARITAS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION VS. CONSUELA QUINTANILLA ET AL

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND

Hearing date
Sep 22, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 30, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCARITAS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
DefendantCONSUELA QUINTANILLA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679053 - September 22, 2025 Hearing date: September 22, 2025 Case number: CUD25679053 Case title: CARITAS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION VS. CONSUELA QUINTANILLA ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679053 | Case Title: | | CARITAS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION VS. CONSUELA QUINTANILLA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-22 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 22, 2025 line 8.

DEFENDANT CONSUELA QUINTANILLA'S MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND RECALL WRIT OF POSSESSION is CONTINUED to September 30, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., for the moving party to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the moving papers no later than September 23, 2025 with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. (Opposition received.) =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share