Ryan Cardenas vs Warren Campbell, et al.
Motion to Compel Compliance of Two Chairs Psychiatry and Therapy Services of California, P.C. with Subpoena for Business Records; Request for Contempt and Monetary Sanctions
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
22CV-03955 Ryan Cardenas vs Warren Campbell, et al.
Motion to Compel Compliance of Two Chairs Psychiatry and Therapy Services of California, P.C. with Subpoena for Business Records; Request for Contempt and Monetary Sanctions
The motion to compel compliance with the subpoena for business records is GRANTED.
Two Chairs Psychiatry and Therapy Services of California, P.C. are ordered to comply with the subpoena within fifteen (15) days of service of this Court’s order.
The request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED.
Monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,000 are to be paid by Two Chairs Psychiatry and Therapy Services of California, P.C. to Defendant within thirty (30) days of service of this Court’s order.
Defendant is ordered to prepare a proposed order to be filed with this court within five (5) days.
24CV-03146 Carmelo Lorenzo vs 3K Farming Company, Inc., et al.
Motion for Summary Judgment
Defendant Kahlon Farming Management Company’s (“KFMC”) unopposed motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
Upon consideration of all the evidence set forth in the moving papers, the Court finds that there is no triable issue of material fact and Defendant KFMC is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Defendant KFMC filed a separate statement of undisputed material facts, supported by admissible evidence, containing undisputed material facts that establish Plaintiffs’ PAGA claims are time barred and Plaintiffs cannot prove the requisite control element to hold Defendant KFMC liable.
This shifts the burden to Plaintiffs to show the existence of one or more triable issues of material fact. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (p)(2).) By not filing any opposition, including a separate statement, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden on this motion.
Defendant KFMC is ordered to prepare and file a proposed order consistent with this order within five (5) days.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”