DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682107·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing todayOFF CALENDAR. No valid proof of service on file.

SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT VS. DONALD GILLSON ET AL

Motion To Compel Initial Discovery/Rfas

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT
DefendantDONALD GILLSON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682107 - September 9, 2026 Hearing date: September 9, 2026 Case number: CUD26682107 Case title: SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT VS. DONALD GILLSON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682107 | Case Title: | | SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT VS. DONALD GILLSON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Compel Initial Discovery/Rfas | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 9, 2026, line 11.

Defendant's Motion to Compel Initial Discovery is OFF CALENDAR. No valid proof of service on file. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share