DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD20667352·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing todayDENIED without prejudice.

FELL HOLDINGS LLC VS. FELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Protective Order And/Or Case-Management Discovery Order Regulating The Manner And Conditions Of Further Discovery Meet-And-Confer Proceedings And Establishing Discovery Sequencing

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffFELL HOLDINGS LLC
DefendantFELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD20667352 - September 9, 2026 Hearing date: September 9, 2026 Case number: CUD20667352 Case title: FELL HOLDINGS LLC VS. FELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL Case Number: | | CUD20667352 | Case Title: | | FELL HOLDINGS LLC VS. FELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Protective Order And/Or Case-Management Discovery Order Regulating The Manner And Conditions Of Further Discovery Meet-And-Confer Proceedings And Establishing Discovery Sequencing | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 9, 2026, line 6.

Defendants' Motion for Protective Order and/or Case-Management Discovery Order is DENIED without prejudice. First, Defendants cite no authority for the appointment of the "neutral facilitator" requested, as Defendants specifically clarify that this person would not be referee authorized under CCP 639. Second, Defendants have not provided the Court with either the discovery requests nor the responses at issue. With no ability to review or refer to the discovery, the Court cannot determine whether justice requires the requested protective order, which would broadly and preemptively restrain Plaintiff from seeking relief, to protect Defendants from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue expense. (See CCP 2030.090(b), 2031.060(b).)

Any period for Plaintiff to bring a motion regarding the subject discovery is tolled from July 9, 2026 to September 9, 2026. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/MT)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 4132 4666; Password: 872834; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 4132 4666; Password: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share