ADA CHIU VS. JACKSON YU ET AL
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Reclassify Action As An Unlimited Case
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24619204 - September 9, 2026 Hearing date: September 9, 2026 Case number: CGC24619204 Case title: ADA CHIU VS. JACKSON YU ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24619204 | Case Title: | | ADA CHIU VS. JACKSON YU ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Reclassify Action As An Unlimited Case; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 9, 2026, line 3. Defendant's Motion to Reclassify Action as Unlimited Case. Hearing Required.
No later than 9:00 a.m. on September 9, 2026, moving party to file an amended proof of service properly including on the necessary information. Moving party may use a properly filled-out Judicial Council Form (POS-050) or use the Judicial Council form for guidance as to the necessary information. Proof of Service filed on August 7, 2026 is deficient. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”