DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678838·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoHEARING REQUIRED

1066 MARKET LLC VS. RAYNELL JOHNSON ET AL

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND

Hearing date
Aug 19, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff1066 MARKET LLC
DefendantRAYNELL JOHNSON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678838 - August 19, 2025 Hearing date: August 19, 2025 Case number: CUD25678838 Case title: 1066 MARKET LLC VS. RAYNELL JOHNSON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678838 | Case Title: | | 1066 MARKET LLC VS. RAYNELL JOHNSON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 19, 2025, line 11. Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default, Vacate Default Judgment and Recall Writ of Execution.

HEARING REQUIRED. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share