DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25STCV37750·la·Civil·General Civil
Hearing todayGRANTED

Mario Rodriguez v. Tyler Perry, et al.

Application to appear pro hac vice

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
407
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$50.00

Parties

PlaintiffMario Rodriguez
DefendantTyler Perry
DefendantLions Gate Films Inc.

Attorneys

Alex Spirofor Defendant

Ruling

CASE NO.: 25STCV37750 VERIFIED APPLICATION OF ALEX SPIRO TO APPEAR AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE I. INTRODUCTION On July 15, 2026, Applicant, Alex Spiro, filed this application to appear pro hac vice in this action on behalf of Defendants, Tyler Perry and Lions Gate Films Inc. The application is unopposed.¿¿ ¿¿ II. LEGAL STANDARD California Rules of Court, rule 9.40 provides that an attorney in good standing in another jurisdiction may apply to appear as counsel pro hac vice in the State of California by filing a verified application together with proof of service by mail of a copy of the application and notice of hearing on all parties who have appeared in the case and on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office, with payment of a $50.00 fee, so long as that attorney is not a resident of the State of California, and is not regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California.¿ (Cal.

R. Ct., rule 9.40.)¿¿¿¿ ¿¿¿¿ The application must state: (1) the applicant's residence

and office addresses; (2) the courts to which the applicant has been admitted to practice and the dates of admission; (3) that the applicant is a member of good standing in those courts; (4) that the applicant is not currently suspended or disbarred in any court; (5) the title of each court and cause in which the applicant has filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this state in the preceding two years, the date of each application, and whether or not it was granted; and (6) the name, address, and telephone number of the active member of the State Bar of California who is attorney of record in the local action.¿ (Cal.

R. Ct., rule 9.40(d).)¿¿¿¿ III. DISCUSSION ¿ ¿ Alex Spiro seeks a court order allowing him to appear as counsel pro hac vice to represent Defendants in this action.¿¿¿¿ ¿¿ ¿¿ Upon review, the court finds the application complies with California Rules of Court, rule 9.40.¿¿¿¿¿ IV. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the unopposed application is GRANTED.¿ It is ordered that Alex Spiro be admitted to appear as counsel pro hac vice for the purpose of representing Defendants Tyler Perry and Lions Gate Films Inc. in this action.¿ Applicant shall be subject to all applicable rules of this Court.¿¿¿ Moving party to give notice.¿¿¿¿ Dated: September 9, 2026 | | | Brock T.

Hammond Judge of the Superior Court |

Judge Brock Hammond, Department 407 HEARING DATE: September 9, 2026 TRIAL DATE: Not set CASE: Jaya Taylor v. 600 Tower, LLC, et al.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share