DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678378·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 11 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Notice of settlement on file.

LALITA CARR VS. LUIS CAUANUL ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Compel Attendance At Deposition Of Michael Bianchi, Monetary Sanctions, And Continue Trial

Hearing date
Sep 15, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLALITA CARR
DefendantLUIS CAUANUL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678378 - September 15, 2025 Hearing date: September 15, 2025 Case number: CUD25678378 Case title: LALITA CARR VS. LUIS CAUANUL ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678378 | Case Title: | | LALITA CARR VS. LUIS CAUANUL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-15 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Attendance At Deposition Of Michael Bianchi, Monetary Sanctions, And Continue Trial | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Sept 15, 2025. Line 11.2.

DEFENDANT LUIS CANUL (SUED AS LUIS CAUANUL) Notice Of Motion To Compel Attendance At Deposition Of Michael Bianchi, Monetary Sanctions, And Continue Trial is OFF CALENDAR. Notice of settlement on file. =(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share