Horwich - Trust
Motion to Quash Service of Civil Subpoena
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
8 Horwich - Trust;
Horwich – Trust (2018-01045532) # Motion to Quash
The court does not provide a tentative ruling on Respondent Holly M. Emge’s Motion for Order Quashing Service of Civil Subpoena for Personal Appearance or Alternatively for Protective Order on Production of Documents (ROA 2253) as it wishes to hear from the parties on certain issues as forth below.
By her motion, Respondent Holly Emge seeks to quash a subpoena apparently calling for her to produce certain documents. However, neither the motion nor the supporting documents present the subject subpoena for the court’s review. Accordingly, the court cannot address moving party’s assertion that the subpoena was not properly served or that the requested documents are protected by the attorney work product doctrine and/or the attorney-client privilege. Moving party should be prepared to address the absence of this critical document.
Finally, on August 6, 2026, Judge Rowe ordered Robert Horwich “to authorize the release of all billing statements regarding money paid from the trust or concerning trust litigation from Brower Law Group, Greenberg Gross, and Holly Emge, Esq. to be given to Jeffrey Horwich.” (ROA 2303, emphasis added.) The parties should be prepared to address whether that order addresses, in any fashion, the instant motion to quash
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”