The Kanavel Group, LLC vs 1-20 DOES

To access the courtroom, click or copy and paste this link into your internet browser and scroll to

Department 6: https://santaclara.courts.ca.gov/online-services/remote-hearings

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 23CV410362 The Kanavel Group, No opposition has been filed yet the reply brief references an opposition. Matter 1 LLC vs 1-20 DOES needs to be continued. 9:00 24CV444587 Paul Roberts vs. Jeff Plaintiff moves this court to deem admitted the truth of the matters associated in 2 Newman, et.al. Requests for Admissions Set One. Plaintiff propounded a request for admissions which was not answered by Defendant Jeff Newman. No objections were filed against this motion.

Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for monetary sanctions of $3200 to be paid within fifteen days of the filing of this order is GRANTED. 9:00 24CV446638 Edson Renteria- Plaintiff petitions this court to compel discovery responses to form 3 Garcia vs. Sofia Salas, interrogatories—General Set One to Defendant Pittsburg Wholesale Grocers, Inc. et.al. Defendant failed to respond to Plaintiff’s request for interrogatories. Plaintiff’s petition is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for monetary damages in the amount of $1,310.00 is GRANTED. 9:00 24CV447263 Jeremy Hansen vs.

OFF CALENDAR 4 Lyft, Inc., et.al. 9:00 25CV461594 Monica Alcantar vs. Plaintiff moves this court to stay proceedings. Plaintiff fails to state a compelling 5 General Motors, LLC reason why the court should stay legal proceedings other than an appeal has been filed. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 9:00 26cv488876 Gilbert Marosi vs. Plaintiff filed this case without first seeking a court order, Plaintiff is included ion 6-7 Madhu Sridhar the California Judicial Council’s Vexatious Litigant list. Plaintiff was notified that he needed to seek a prefiling order within 10 days of the notice, otherwise the case would be dismissed pursuant to CCP section 391.7.

More than 10 days after the filing of the notice, plaintiff filed a peremptory challenge pursuant to CCP section 170.6. The case is automatically DISMISSED pursuant to CCP section 391.7(c) which states that “[t]he litigation shall be automatically dismissed unless the plaintiff within 10 days of the filing of the notice obtains an order from the presiding judge permitting the filing of the litigation as set forth in subdivision (b)” and that “litigation includes any petition, application, or motion, other than a discovery motion....”

Plaintiff may not avoid the dismissal through the filing of a peremptory challenge. The case was automatically dismissed as of September 3, 2026 pursuant to CCP section 391(c). 9:01 25CV476123 LVNV Funding vs. Ray Attorney Christina Melhouse moves this court to withdraw from her current 1 Wilson representation of Defendant Ray Wilson. Attorney represents that there has been a breakdown in relationship with her client. No opposition was filed. Motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

2