DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV424337·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayGRANTED

Calhoun v. City of Monte Sereno, et al.

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE Cross-Complaint

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
12
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCalhoun
DefendantCity of Monte Sereno

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230

DATE: 09/09/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 23CV424337 Calhoun MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE Cross-Complaint v. City of Monte Sereno, et al. Unopposed and Granted LINE 2 24CV453643 Norma Navarro MOTION TO COMPEL – Further Responses to Requests for Productions v. of Documents, Set One; and for Monetary Sanctions Ralph Borelli, et al Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 2 LINE 3 MOTION TO COMPEL – Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One; and for Sanctions

Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 3 LINE 4 MOTION TO QUASH – Deposition Subpoenas Issues to 1944 Borelli Trustee

Off calendar LINE 5 MOTION TO QUASH - Deposition subpoena Issued to KB Home South Bay Inc. and for Monetary Sanctions

Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 5 LINE 6 MOTION TO QUASH - Deposition Subpoena Issues to Borelli Investment Company and for Monetary Sanctions

Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 6 LINE 7 MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER By Defs Borelli and RNB Associates

Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 7 LINE 8 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 8 LINE 9 25CV465220 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 9

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share