DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677417·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 11 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1170.8 and 1010.6.

CLARA LUZ MIRANDA VS. JESSY PEREIRA

Notice Of Motion To Compel Answers To Interrogatories And Requests For Production Of Documetns And For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Sep 15, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCLARA LUZ MIRANDA
DefendantJESSY PEREIRA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25677417 - September 15, 2025 Hearing date: September 15, 2025 Case number: CUD25677417 Case title: CLARA LUZ MIRANDA VS. JESSY PEREIRA Case Number: | | CUD25677417 | Case Title: | | CLARA LUZ MIRANDA VS. JESSY PEREIRA | Court Date: | | 2025-09-15 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Answers To Interrogatories And Requests For Production Of Documetns And For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Sept 15, 2025. Line 7.

DEFENDANT JESSY PEREIRA, AN INDIVIDUAL Notice Of Motion To Compel Answers To Interrogatories And Requests For Production Of Documetns And For Monetary Sanctions is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1170.8 and 1010.6.=(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share