DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV005738·alameda·Civil·Contract
Hearing todayDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

TRANVU, LLC vs MACHADO

Motion to Strike

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
19
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTRANVU, LLC
DefendantGowerks, Inc.
DefendantRana and Family LLC
DefendantMACHADO

Ruling

22CV005738: TRANVU, LLC vs MACHADO 09/09/2026 Hearing on Motion to Strike Tranvu's Motion to Strike asto Defenants Gowerks, Inc. and Rana; filed by TRANVU, LLC (Plaintiff) CRS# 981223307737 in Department 19

Tentative Ruling - 09/02/2026 Joscelyn Jones

The Motion to Strike (not initial pleading) Tranvu, LLCs Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Answers of Defendant Gowerks and Rana and Family filed by TRANVU, LLC on 07/22/2026 is Denied.

Plaintiff Tranvu LLC’s unopposed Motion to Strike the Answers of Defendants Gowerks Inc. and Rana and Family LLC is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Plaintiff has failed to file a proof of service demonstrating that this motion was ever served on any other party to this case.

If Plaintiff refiles this motion, Plaintiff shall identify (1) the date when the former counsel for Gowerks Inc. and Rana and Family LLC substituted out of or withdrew from the case, and (2) the date the Court purportedly ordered that Gowerks Inc. and Rana and Family LLC obtain new counsel by June 16, 2026. The register of actions for this case contains 725 entries, and the Court does not have the time to search through the register of actions to obtain the basic factual information that Plaintiff should provide as the basis for its motion.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share