Davis, Katherine v. Arredondo Group Inc et al.

6. 26CV01665 Perondi, Christopher v. Bingaman, Renee

EVENT: Defendant Renee Bingaman’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication

Defendant Renee Bingaman’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with the notice requirements of CCP 437c(a)(2). Pursuant to Robinson v. Woods (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 1258, 1267-1268, the Court has no authority to continue a summary judgment motion to cure the notice defect. Rather Defendant must refile and serve the motion in accordance with the notice requirements of CCP 437c(a)(2).

7-8. 26CV01872 Davis, Katherine v. Arredondo Group Inc et al.

EVENT: (1) Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint (2) Defendant Adesa California LLC’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint

In light of the First Amended Complaint filed on August 26, 2026, the demurrers are moot.

9. 26CV02234 Grayson, John I, IV v. Internal Revenue Service

EVENT: “Tentative Ruling Order Motion” (Continued from 8/26/26)

The case is dismissed with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. State courts do not have jurisdiction over the Internal Revenue Service nor does it have subject matter jurisdiction over federal tax disputes. (See Civiletti v. Municipal Court (1981) 116 Cal.App.3d 105, 109; 28 USCS 1346)

6|Page