DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24614948·sf·Civil·Lemon Law
Hearing in about 4 hoursSet for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday , September 09, 2026, Line 6. DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.'s Motion To Compel Vehicle Inspection And Request For Monetary Sanctions In The Amount Of $2,160. (Please check at 3:00 p.m. for the complete Tentative Ruling.)

RAUL O. GOPAR VASQUEZ VS. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., A CALIFORNIA ET AL

Motion To Compel Vehicle Inspection And Request For Monetary Sanctions In The Amount Of $2,160

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,160

Parties

PlaintiffRAUL O. GOPAR VASQUEZ
DefendantAMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC24614948 - September 9, 2026 Hearing date: September 9, 2026 Case number: CGC24614948 Case title: RAUL O. GOPAR VASQUEZ VS. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., A CALIFORNIA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24614948 | Case Title: | | RAUL O. GOPAR VASQUEZ VS. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., A CALIFORNIA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-09 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Vehicle Inspection And Request For Monetary Sanctions In The Amount Of $2,160; | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday, September 09, 2026, Line 6. DEFENDANT AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.'s Motion To Compel Vehicle Inspection And Request For Monetary Sanctions In The Amount Of $2,160. (Please check at 3:00 p.m. for the complete Tentative Ruling.) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share