DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF23518413·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 12 months agoDENIED

DOUGLAS ALAN GREENBERG VS. ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD OF THE CITY AND COUNTY ET AL

Notice Of Motion Requesting Certification Of Controlling Question Of Law For Appeal

Hearing date
Sep 5, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDOUGLAS ALAN GREENBERG
DefendantASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD OF THE CITY AND COUNTY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF23518413 - September 5, 2025 Hearing date: September 5, 2025 Case number: CPF23518413 Case title: DOUGLAS ALAN GREENBERG VS. ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD OF THE CITY AND COUNTY ET AL Case Number: | | CPF23518413 | Case Title: | | DOUGLAS ALAN GREENBERG VS. ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD OF THE CITY AND COUNTY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-05 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion Requesting Certification Of Controlling Question Of Law For Appeal | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 5, 2025 line 1.

RESPONDENTS' MOTION REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF CONTROLLING QUESTION OF LAW FOR APPEAL is DENIED. The Court will not exercise its discretion to certify that substantial grounds for difference of opinion exist regarding "the questions of whether the Demurrer Order erred in its interpretation of Rule 325(a)(3) and whether Petitioner's tax refund claim against CCSF is time-barred as "controlling question[s] of law as to which there are substantial grounds for difference of opinion." =(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share