DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF23517978·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

IN RE: CLEAR RECON CORP

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order To Release Court-Deposited Funds To E K Y Builder Inc. And Stella Tan

Hearing date
Aug 7, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherE K Y Builder Inc.
OtherStella Tan

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF23517978 - August 7, 2025 Hearing date: August 7, 2025 Case number: CPF23517978 Case title: IN RE: CLEAR RECON CORP Case Number: | | CPF23517978 | Case Title: | | IN RE: CLEAR RECON CORP | Court Date: | | 2025-08-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order To Release Court-Deposited Funds To E K Y Builder Inc. And Stella Tan | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 7, 2025, line 1.

Respondent's Motion for Order to Release Court-Deposited Funds is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Moving party has no competent evidence that there are no encumbrances on the property. The email response from Petitioner's counsel does not say the word "encumbrance," yet moving party relies exclusively on this email as evidence of the absence of encumbrances on the property. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share