| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Application And Hearing For Right To Attach Order, Order For Issuance Of Writ Of Attachment
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25626759 - September 16, 2025 Hearing date: September 16, 2025 Case number: CGC25626759 Case title: SOPHIE PAPPAS ET AL VS. 1853 UNION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, A CALIFORNIA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25626759 | Case Title: | | SOPHIE PAPPAS ET AL VS. 1853 UNION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, A CALIFORNIA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Application And Hearing For Right To Attach Order, Order For Issuance Of Writ Of Attachment | Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 16, 2025, line 8.
Plaintiffs' Application for Right to Attach Order is GRANTED in part as follows: (1) taxes and utilities and (2). Rent/daily damages through July 31, 2025, subject to Plaintiff dismissing the remainder of the unlawful detainer action having obtained judgment for possession only. Plaintiff to prepare an order. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”