PALACIOS VS ANSCHUTZ ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

However, as pointed out in Plaintiff’s reply the new causes of action for Premises Liability, (12th), Trespass (13th) and Financial Elder Abuse (14th) are based on allegations and facts previously pleaded in the Second Amended Complaint, and the court finds that permitting those causes of action as well as punitive damages to be included is not prejudicial.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend is GRANTED.

Plaintiff is directed to submit an amended complaint reflecting the amended causes of action 1st-7th and 10th, and include the new causes of action listed in the preceding paragraph.

Amended complaint to be filed within 30 days of this order.

Case Management Conference continued to November 9, 2026.

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO STRIKE 1ST GUILLAUME VS CITY OF AMENDED COMPLAINT OF RONDA CVPS2507057 CATHEDRAL CITY GUILLAUME BY CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling.

Hearing is continued to September 21, 2026 to permit Defendant to submit a Reply to the untimely filed Opposition. Reply to be filed by September 14, 2026. No further briefing permitted.

Case Management Conference continued to September 21, 2026.

6. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME PALACIOS VS DEMURRER ON 1ST AMENDED ANSCHUTZ COMPLAINT OF JAVIER REGINO CVPS2600851 ENTERTAINMENT PALACIOS BY GOLDENVOICE, GROUP, INC., A LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION COMPANY Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling.

The hearing on the demurrer is continued to October 23, 2026. The parties are ordered to meet and confer via in person, teleconference or phone for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections raised in the demurrer. As part of the meet and confer process, Defendant shall identify the specific causes of action that it believes are subject to demurrer and identify with legal support the basis of the deficiencies. Plaintiffs shall provide legal support for their position that the pleading is legally sufficient or, in the alternative, how the complaint may be amended to cure any legal insufficiency.

After meeting and conferring, the parties shall 10 days before the continued hearing date set above do one of the following:

(1) Defendant vacate the hearing on the demurrer, and file an Answer;

(2) The Parties file with the court a joint declaration stating the parties have agreed that Plaintiff will file an amended complaint before the date set forth above; or

(3) The Parties file with the court a joint declaration stating the means by which the parties met and conferred and identifying the specific objections in the demurrer and supporting memorandum of points and authorities that the parties were unable to resolve. (CCP §430.41(a)(3), CCP §435.5(a)(3).)

The court will not accept further briefing.

Case Management Conference continued to October 23, 2026. Parties are directed to not submit updated Case Management Statements for the next hearing date.

7.

CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CHAPMAN VS MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS CVPS2602881 CHAPMAN COUNSEL FOR DAVID CHAPMAN Tentative Ruling:

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel GRANTED

Counsel to submit proposed order MC-053. Court will sign proposed order once submitted.

Attorneys Vincent Whittaker, Chandra Roam and Emma York are relieved as counsel of record for Defendant/Cross-Complainant David Chapman, effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the signed order upon the client.

Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena for Production of Records is continued to October 21, 2026..

Case Management Conference is confirmed for October 21, 2026.

A status hearing re representation for Defendant/Cross-Complainant David Chapman is scheduled for October 21, 2026.