DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25623983·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

KURT GRIMES VS. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Expunge Notice Of Pendency Of Action

Hearing date
Aug 8, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 22, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKURT GRIMES
DefendantRUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25623983 - August 8, 2025 Hearing date: August 8, 2025 Case number: CGC25623983 Case title: KURT GRIMES VS. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25623983 | Case Title: | | KURT GRIMES VS. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-08 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Expunge Notice Of Pendency Of Action | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 8, 2025, line 7.

Defendant's Motion to Expunge Notice of Pendency of Action is CONTINUED to August 22, 2025, pursuant to the stipulation on file. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share