DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622782·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

VENUS HAPP ET AL VS. LINDSAY BRENNAN ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Aug 6, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 22, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffVENUS HAPP
DefendantLINDSAY BRENNAN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622782 - August 6, 2025 Hearing date: August 6, 2025 Case number: CGC25622782 Case title: VENUS HAPP ET AL VS. LINDSAY BRENNAN ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622782 | Case Title: | | VENUS HAPP ET AL VS. LINDSAY BRENNAN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-06 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 6, 2025, line 1.

Defendant's Demurrer to Amended Complaint is CONTINUED to August 22, 2025 for parties to meet and confer. (CCP 430.41(a).) The Court encourages the parties to meaningfully discuss the pleadings with an eye toward reducing the number of issues or eliminating the need for a demurrer. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share