Plaintiff v. Allen

both unforeseen and unforeseeable, and that will constitute cause to move the trial. For that, and only that, reason, the application is GRANTED. The court will need to set a TSC. The court does not want to set it until Multi Social's counsel's situation has firmed up, which the court very much hopes is soon. The parties also agree to extend the discovery cut off dates. Accordingly, the court will order that the DISCOVERY CUT OFF DATES (INCLUDING EXPERTS) WILL BE TIED TO THE NEW TRIAL DATE WHEN SET. The court notes that this is a reprieve for Sunset, which was otherwise in the danger of having its complaint stricken and perhaps its answer to the cross complaint as well.

hearing took care of this. Case Number: 25SMUD02217 Hearing Date: September 8, 2026 Dept: I The court will hear from the parties as to the status. The issue was whether there was a meeting between plaintiff, defendant, and the VA in which the VA agreed to reinstate the benefits, but a month late. If such is the case and everyone was there and agreed, the court would think that this would be sufficient to bar the application for entry of judgment. However, the agreement was clear that Allen is responsible for ensuring that plaintiff get 100% of the rent due.

If the VA will not pay the subsidy for a portion of time, Allen remains liable for the unpaid amount, as discussed in the agreement. Case Number: SC126806 Hearing Date: September 8, 2026 Dept: I This is a motion against Jane Doe and another against May Doe. As to Jane, the motion is MOOT because Jane Doe has dismissed the causes of action at issue. As to May Doe, the issue is live. Please call the courtroom after 8 am to obtain a copy of the court's tentative. | Home -->)" -->