DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24623115·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoCONTINUED

CONNIE WONG ET AL VS. LINDA YEE ET AL

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Hearing date
Sep 15, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 29, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCONNIE WONG
DefendantLINDA YEE
DefendantDERRICK YEE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24623115 - September 15, 2025 Hearing date: September 15, 2025 Case number: CGC24623115 Case title: CONNIE WONG ET AL VS. LINDA YEE ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24623115 | Case Title: | | CONNIE WONG ET AL VS. LINDA YEE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-15 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Sept 15, 2025. Line 6. DEFENDANT LINDA YEE, DERRICK YEE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS is continued to September 29, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., on the Court's own motion.=(501/SKF) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share