DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
202200564237PRGE·ventura·Probate·Guardianship Status Review
Hearing todayCONTINUED

In the Matter of Shirk Minors

Status Review (Guardianship) to Confirm Receipt of Confidential Guardianship Status Report & VN267

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Nov 10, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

202200564237PRGE: In the Matter of Shirk Minors 09/08/2026 in Department J6 Status Review (Guardianship) to Confirm Receipt of Confidential Guardianship Status Report & VN267

The guardianship status report and informal account were filed on 7/16/26 for minor. No appearance required.

Based on the deposit of funds into a blocked account, the court shall continue to waive accounts as long as the source, income, and blocked account for minor’s funds remains unchanged.

The Court notes that minor Justin Shirk obtains the age of majority on 10/07/2026. As such, the Court will not schedule futures hearings for status reports and informal accountings.

Guardian to file petition to terminate guardianship of estate after minor reaches age of majority.

Ventura County Local Rule 10.03(G) states that form VN-267 and attachments “are to be filed with the court and served on the courtappointed counsel for the conservatee/ward, as well as the Court Investigator’s Offices, thirty (30) days prior to when the hearing of the informal accounting would otherwise be heard.” As of 9/1/26 no proof of service has been filed showing service to the CI. If not filed before the hearing, the Court will continue this hearing to 11/10/26 at 10:30 a.m. in J6 in order for the proof of service to be filed.

The clerk shall give notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share