DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24617633·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoGRANTED

WESTFIELD 816-818 MISSION STREET LLC, VS. NASS ENTERPRISE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Sep 19, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWESTFIELD 816-818 MISSION STREET LLC
DefendantNASS ENTERPRISE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DefendantATIQUR RAHMAN
DefendantSHAHIDUL HAQUE
DefendantSALEH SARWAR
DefendantNARESH GUPTA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24617633 - September 19, 2025 Hearing date: September 19, 2025 Case number: CGC24617633 Case title: WESTFIELD 816-818 MISSION STREET LLC, VS. NASS ENTERPRISE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24617633 | Case Title: | | WESTFIELD 816-818 MISSION STREET LLC, VS. NASS ENTERPRISE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Sept 19, 2025. Line 5.

DEFENDANT NASS ENTERPRISE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ATIQUR RAHMAN, SHAHIDUL HAQUE, SALEH SARWAR, NARESH GUPTA MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD is GRANTED. No opposition filed. Counsel to prepare an order. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share