DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24617002·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 12 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005.

BHSD 505 PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. HOSIE RICE, LLP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Strike Excess Pages Of Plaintiffs' Reply Brief In Support Of Its Motion For Summary Adjudication For Exceeding The Page Limit

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBHSD 505 PROPCO LLC
DefendantHOSIE RICE, LLP

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24617002 - September 4, 2025 Hearing date: September 4, 2025 Case number: CGC24617002 Case title: BHSD 505 PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. HOSIE RICE, LLP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24617002 | Case Title: | | BHSD 505 PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. HOSIE RICE, LLP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-04 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Strike Excess Pages Of Plaintiffs' Reply Brief In Support Of Its Motion For Summary Adjudication For Exceeding The Page Limit | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 4, 2025 line 1.

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE EXCESS PAGES OF PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION FOR EXCEEDING THE PAGE LIMIT is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005. The Court notes that the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of the Reply, excluding the captions page, Table of Contents and Table of Authorities, is 10 pages long. =(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share