DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24612227·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoOFF CALENDAR

HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Requests For Admissions From Glenn Fama And Kimberly Fama

Hearing date
Sep 12, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHong Zheng
PlaintiffMacro Rojo Trust
PlaintiffHong Xiao
DefendantGlenn Fama
DefendantKimberly Fama

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24612227 - September 12, 2025 Hearing date: September 12, 2025 Case number: CGC24612227 Case title: HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24612227 | Case Title: | | HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-12 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Requests For Admissions From Glenn Fama And Kimberly Fama | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Sept 12, 2025. Line 4. PLAINTIFF HONG ZHENG, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE MACRO ROJO TRUST, HONG XIAO Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Requests For Admissions From Glenn Fama And Kimberly Fama is OFF CALENDAR. Amended notice of motion on file. =(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share