DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23608759·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoDENIED

MATTHEW MEDLOCK ET AL VS. BOON WAI SHIU ET AL

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-24-618081 WITH CASE CGC-23-608759

Hearing date
Sep 19, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMATTHEW MEDLOCK
DefendantBOON WAI SHIU
Cross-DefendantBOON SHIU
Cross-DefendantKEEHYUN CHOI

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23608759 - September 19, 2025 Hearing date: September 19, 2025 Case number: CGC23608759 Case title: MATTHEW MEDLOCK ET AL VS. BOON WAI SHIU ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23608759 | Case Title: | | MATTHEW MEDLOCK ET AL VS. BOON WAI SHIU ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-24-618081 WITH CASE CGC-23-608759 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Sept 19, 2025.

Line 3. CROSS DEFENDANT BOON SHIU, AN INDIVIDUAL, KEEHYUN CHOI MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CGC-24-618081 WITH CASE CGC-23-608759 is DENIED. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share