DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23607732·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 12 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Amended Motion on file.

JENNY SILVA-ROLAND ET AL VS. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Protective Order By Defendant Servicelink Agency Sales And Posting Llc

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJENNY SILVA-ROLAND
DefendantBANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK
DefendantSERVICELINK AGENCY SALES AND POSTING LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23607732 - August 27, 2025 Hearing date: August 27, 2025 Case number: CGC23607732 Case title: JENNY SILVA-ROLAND ET AL VS. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23607732 | Case Title: | | JENNY SILVA-ROLAND ET AL VS. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Protective Order By Defendant Servicelink Agency Sales And Posting Llc | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 27, 2025, line 3.

Defendant Servicelink Agency Sales and Posting LLC's Motion for Protective Order is OFF CALENDAR. Amended Motion on file. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share