DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23607679·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

MAYA BLYTH VS. LEAL UGRIN ET AL

Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default

Hearing date
Aug 5, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMAYA BLYTH
DefendantLEAL UGRIN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23607679 - August 5, 2025 Hearing date: August 5, 2025 Case number: CGC23607679 Case title: MAYA BLYTH VS. LEAL UGRIN ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23607679 | Case Title: | | MAYA BLYTH VS. LEAL UGRIN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-05 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | REAL PROPERTY/HOUSING MOTIONS CALENDAR | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for August 5, 2025, line 1. Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default is GRANTED.

Defendant is not at fault for failing to file a responsive pleading and thus is entitled to discretionary relief under CCP 473(b). =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share