DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV177231·alameda·Civil·Case Management
Hearing todayCourt will issue standard pretrial/trial setting order for jury trial.

PORTILLO, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al. vs REIMERS, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al.

Initial Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
20
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPORTILLO
DefendantREIMERS

Ruling

26CV177231: PORTILLO, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al. vs REIMERS, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al. 09/08/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 20

Tentative Ruling - 09/04/2026 Thomas Eagle Weathers

Because the case appears at issue, the court will issue standard pretrial/trial setting order for jury trial. No need for parties to appear unless they contest.

If a party does not timely contest the foregoing Tentative Ruling and appear at the hearing, the Tentative Ruling will become the order of the court.

HOW DO I CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING?

THROUGH ECOURT Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps: 1. Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select "Search" 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select "Click to Contest this Ruling" 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select "Proceed" BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing. This will permit the department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely.

BOTH ECOURT AND EMAIL notices are required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share