DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV102260·alameda·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayCONTINUED

SALAZAR vs RATTAIRE

Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Mediate

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
22
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 6, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$800

Parties

PlaintiffSALAZAR
DefendantRATTAIRE

Ruling

24CV102260: SALAZAR vs RATTAIRE 09/08/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Mediate in Department 22

Tentative Ruling - 09/02/2026 Han N. Tran

The Court orders the following after review of the case.

The Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Mediate scheduled for 09/08/2026 is continued to 10/06/2026 at 3:00 PM in Department 22 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

The case is scheduled for a 9/8/26 Order to Show Cause re: Failure to Mediate.

According to the parties' separate 8/25/26 responses to the Order to Show Cause, mediation has not occurred but is scheduled for 9/10/26.

As such, the Court continues the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE in re SANCTIONS for failure to comply with the Court's trial setting order. Cal. Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.1340, 3.725; Code Civ. Proc. §§ 177.5, 575.2, 583.150, 583.360, 583.410, 583.420, 583.430; Govt. Code § 68608.

WRITTEN OBJECTION/RESPONSE to the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to the reasons that sanctions should not be imposed must be filed no later than 9/29/26.

Copies of the written responses shall be emailed to the department clerk concurrent with their filing.

If the parties complete mediation PRIOR to the date above and filed a timely WRITTEN OBJECTION/RESPONSE to the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, the order to show cause may be discharged. If parties fail to do so or fail to show good cause why mediation was not held, monetary sanctions of $800 per party may issue.

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record.

*******************************************************************

IF YOU DO NOT CONTEST THE TENTATIVE RULING AND IF NO OTHER PARTY CONTEST THE TENTATIVE RULING, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO ATTEND THE HEARING AND THE COURT WILL AFFIRM THE TENTATIVE RULING.

IF YOU DO CONTEST THE TENTATIVE RULING, FOLLOW THE PROCEDURE BELOW:

THROUGH eCOURT 24CV102260: SALAZAR vs RATTAIRE 09/08/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Mediate in Department 22 Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps:

1. Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select “Search” 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select “Click to Contest this Ruling” 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select “Proceed”

BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK (dept22@alameda.courts.ca.gov) and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing. This will permit the department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely.

Notice via BOTH eCourt AND email is required. The tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if no party contests the tentative ruling.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share