Labor Commissioner, State of California v. Reingold, et al.
MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
CASE NO.: 19STCV21698 MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT MOVING PARTY/PARTIES: Plaintiff Labor Commissioner, State of California RESPONDING PARTY/PARTIES: None PROOF OF SERVICE: · Correct Address: Yes. · Served electronically on March 27, 2026 for a hearing date of September 10, 2026. CASE HISTORY: · June 20, 2019: Complaint filed. · October 17, 2019: First amended complaint filed. · March 9, 2023: Notice of settlement of entire case filed. STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS: Plaintiff Labor Commissioner, State of California ("Plaintiff") settled its claims against Defendants Angelica Reingold, individually and as trustee of the Alex and Angelica Reingold Family Trust, Alexander Reingold, individually and as trustee of the Alex and Angelica Reingold Family Trust and the 2018 Alexander Reingold Revocable Trust, Liran Reingold, in his capacity as trustee of the 2018 Alexander Reingold Revocable Trust and the Angelica Reingold Qualified Personal Residence, and Boys Management Corporation ("Defendants").
Plaintiff properly gave notice to Defendant Angelica Reingold via her counsel of record. However, Plaintiff's proof of service does not reflect service on the other Defendants via their counsel of record, Manfredi, Levine, Eccles, Miller
& Lanson. Plaintiff's proof of service states that counsel for Defendant Angelica Reingold is counsel for all Defendants. Nothing in this Court's file reflects this, however. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to enforce settlement is DENIED without prejudice for failure to give notice. Moving party to give notice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 10, 2026 ___________________________________ Rolf M. Treu Judge of the Superior Court Any party may submit on the tentative ruling by contacting the courtroom via email at SMCDept415@lacourt.ca.gov by no later than 4:00 p.m. the day before the hearing.
All interested parties must be copied on the email. It should be noted that if you submit on a tentative ruling the court will still conduct a hearing if any party appears. By submitting on the tentative you have, in essence, waived your right to be present at the hearing, and you should be aware that the court may not adopt the tentative, and may issue an order which modifies the tentative ruling in whole or in part.
Judge Rolf M. Treu, Department 415 HEARING DATE: September 10, 2026 TRIAL DATE: August 17, 2027 CASE: Sierra LA CDJR, LLC v. Arriola-Talavera et al.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”