DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC21590838·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 12 months agoMOOT

LSC 906-908 BROADWAY LLC VS. STARTUP TEMPLE HOLDINGS, INC. ET AL

Motion and Notice of Hearing for Order Determining Judgment Debtor's Spouse's Claim of Exemption and Opposition to Claim of Exemption

Hearing date
Aug 22, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLSC 906-908 BROADWAY LLC
DefendantSTARTUP TEMPLE HOLDINGS, INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC21590838 - August 22, 2025 Hearing date: August 22, 2025 Case number: CGC21590838 Case title: LSC 906-908 BROADWAY LLC VS. STARTUP TEMPLE HOLDINGS, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC21590838 | Case Title: | | LSC 906-908 BROADWAY LLC VS. STARTUP TEMPLE HOLDINGS, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-22 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion And Notice Of Hearing For Order Determining Judgment Debtor'S Spouse'S Claim Of Exemption And Opposition To Claim Of Exemption; Delcaration Fo Mary Ann Rousso | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 22, 2025, line 1.

Judgment Creditor's Motion for Order Determining Judgment Debtor's Spouse's Claim of Exemption and Opposition to Claim of Exemption is MOOT, in light of the ruling on the Claim of Exemption. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share