DEPENAU v. BARNES
MOTION TO COMPEL APS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, ORDER REQUIRING IN CAMERA REVIEW AND LIMITED PRODUCTION UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
No. 25CV03707 (related to 26PR00065)
STANFORD v. TUCKER
STANFORD’S MOTION TO COMPEL APS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO DEPOSITION SUBPOENA FOR BUSINESS RECORDS
Parties and County Counsel are to appear.
No. 25CV03943
DEPENAU v. BARNES
MOTION TO COMPEL APS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, ORDER REQUIRING IN CAMERA REVIEW AND LIMITED PRODUCTION UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER
Parties and County Counsel are to appear.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”