DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24STCV26881·la·Civil·Civil
Hearing in about 4 hoursGRANTED

Lizette Torres v. Sweet Flores, et al.

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
731
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLizette Torres
DefendantSweet Flores
DefendantDulce Flores
DefendantAlison Alfaro

Attorneys

Ruling

indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar. If a party submits on the tentative, the party's email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If the parties do not submit on the tentative, they should arrange to appear remotely. DATED: September 8, 2026 _____________________________________ MARK C. KIM Judge of the Superior Court

STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT Lizette Torres as Guardian Ad Litem for Minor Child Leah Hernandez, Plaintiff, vs. Sweet Flores, an individual; Dulce Flores, an individual; Alison Alfaro, an individual; and Does 1 to 30, Defendant s. |))))))))))))) | CASE NO: 24STCV26881 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL--CIVIL Dept. 731 September 8, 2026 8:30 a.m. Matter No. 7 | Moving Party: Counsel, Douglas B. Vanderpool Opposing Party: None Notice: OK Now before the Court is counsel Douglas B. Vanderpool 's motion to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Lizette Torres as Guardian Ad Litem for Minor Child Leah Hernandez.

The Court's review shows that c ounsel's moving papers satisfy the requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362: The motion and its corresponding declaration and proposed order were properly executed, filed, and served on Plaintiff and Defendants (none of whom have appeared in this action, and against all three of whom Plaintiff secured entries of default on May 29, 2026), via authorized means (U.S. mail), as reflected in the proofs of service accompanying the moving papers. (See Jul. 17, 2026, Filings & attached Proofs of Service.)

Separately, trial in this action is set for April 12, 2027, affording Plaintiff the opportunity to find substitute counsel to complete either the default proceedings or continue litigating this action, where no opposition from Plaintiff or Defendants appears in the record, showing insufficient prejudice to override relief. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915 [court should consider whether the attorney's "withdrawal can be accomplished without undue prejudice to the client's interests "].)

Moreover, there is no basis to determine that undue delay or injustice will arise from the Court relieving counsel of representation for Plaintiff, particularly where entries of default have been secured against all Defendants. (See Mandell v. Superior Court (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 1, 4 [motion should be denied if it will cause undue delay in the proceeding or cause injustice] .)

The Court accordingly GRANTS counsel's motion, which shall be effective upon the filing of the proof of service of this signed order upon the client. Plaintiff Lizette Torres as Guardian Ad Litem for Minor Child Leah Hernandez is ordered to give notice.

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept731@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.¿ If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar. If a party submits on the tentative, the party's email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If the parties do not submit on the tentative, they should arrange to appear remotely. DATED: September 8, 2026 _____________________________________ MARK C. KIM Judge of the Superior Court

Case Number: 25STCV05328 Hearing Date: September 8, 2026 Dept: 731 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT SANDRA CASTILLO, Plaintiff, vs. YOUNG MEN ' S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH, CLAUDIA MENDOZA, ALVARO RODRIGUEZ, and DOES 1 - 100, inclusive, Defendants. |)))))))

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share