DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26NNCV05106·la·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing in about 3 hoursCONTINUED

RACHEL HERMOSURA, et al. vs CHRISTIAN MERIDA MENDOZA, et al.

Order to Show Cause

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
X
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 3, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRACHEL HERMOSURA
DefendantCHRISTIAN MERIDA MENDOZA

Ruling

(Alhambra Courthouse: Dept. X) September 8, 2026 DEPARTMENT X LAW AND MOTION RULINGS Unless otherwise indicated in the tentative ruling, counsel/parties wishing to submit on a tentative ruling may send an email to alhdeptx@lacourt.ca.gov advising the Court and all counsel of their intention to submit. Prior to sending an email to Department X, counsel/parties should confer with any opposing or appearing parties in the action to determine whether all parties submit. Unless all parties submit, the matter will still be called for hearing and may be argued by any appearing/non-submitting parties. If all parties submit on the Court's tentative ruling, no appearance is necessary and counsel for moving party shall give notice of ruling unless otherwise ordered by the Court. This may be done by incorporating verbatim the Court's tentative ruling.

vs CHRISTIAN MERIDA MENDOZA, et al. Service remains outstanding on the complaint. The Order to Show Cause hearing is continued to December 3, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department X. Case Number: 26NNCV05131 Hearing Date: September 8, 2026 Dept: X #2 - SILVANA ZADOORIAN vs CITY OF GLENDALE, et al. Service remains outstanding on the complaint. The Order to Show Cause hearing is continued to December 7, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department X. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share