DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622040·sf·Civil·Proposition 65 Settlement
Hearing 11 months agoGRANTED

EMA BELL VS. COASTAL COCKTAILS, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Approve Proposition 65 Settlement And Consent Judgment

Hearing date
Sep 30, 2025
Department
302
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffEma Bell
DefendantCoastal Cocktails, Inc.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC25622040 - September 30, 2025 Hearing date: September 30, 2025 Case number: CGC25622040 Case title: EMA BELL VS. COASTAL COCKTAILS, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622040 | Case Title: | | EMA BELL VS. COASTAL COCKTAILS, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-30 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Approve Proposition 65 Settlement And Consent Judgment | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for Tuesday, September 30, 2025, Line 15, PLAINTIFF EMA BELL'S Notice Of Motion And Motion To Approve Proposition 65 Settlement And Consent Judgment.

Plaintiff Ema Bell's unopposed Motion To Approve Proposition 65 Settlement And Consent Judgment is GRANTED. Good cause appearing, Plaintiff's motion to approve settlement pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 25249.7(f) and Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is granted. Based on the record before it, the court finds: (1) the injunctive relief required by the settlement complies with Proposition 65; (2) the penalty amounts are reasonable based on the criteria set forth in Health and Safety Code section 25249.7(b)(2); and, (3) the award of attorney's fees is reasonable under California law. The consent judgments shall be entered consistent with the Proposition 65 Settlement and the parties' [Proposed] Consent Judgment. Prior to the hearing time, Moving Party shall lodge by email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org a proposed order quoting the text above verbatim.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share