DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CU26-00612·solano·Civil·Civil
Hearing in about 7 hoursGranted in part; Denied

ASHFORD v. NEWREZ LLC dba SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, et al.

Motion to Compel Defendant’s Initial Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, Nos. 1-17; Motion for Order Deeming Requests for Admission, Set One, Admitted and for Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
3
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffASHFORD
DefendantNEWREZ LLC dba SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING

Ruling

(3) Plaintiff shall appear and answer all non-privileged questions posed at the deposition;

(4) Within 10 calendar days of this Order, Plaintiff shall produce all documents responsive to the requests set forth in the “Notice of Time and Place of Taking Deposition of Plaintiff Jeremy Owens with Requests for Production of Documents” (“Deposition Notice”), served on Plaintiff on May 22, 2026.

(5) Within 10 calendar days of this Order, Plaintiff shall pay monetary sanctions to Defendant and Cross-Complainant JEANNE FLANDEZ in the amount of $14,543.00.

Failure to comply with this Order, or any portion thereof, may result in the imposition of additional sanctions pursuant to the applicable rules of civil procedure, including monetary sanctions, evidentiary sanctions, issue sanctions, terminating sanctions, and/or contempt proceedings.

ASHFORD v. NEWREZ LLC dba SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, et al. Case No. CU26-00612

1) Motion to Compel Defendant’s Initial Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, Nos. 1-17; and to Confirm Waiver of Objections

2) Motion for Order Deeming Requests for Admission, Set One, Admitted and for Monetary Sanctions

1) The Motion to Compel is Granted, in part. To the extent it has not already responded. Defendant shall serve verified, code-compliant Responses to Plaintiff’s Special Interrogatories, Set One, Numbers 1 through 17, at or before 5:00 p.m. on September 25, 2026. No other orders are made with respect to this motion. The parties are encouraged to be more cooperative in the future when working together, particularly on routine matters such as extension requests.

2) The Motion for Order Deeming Requests for Admissions and Request for Sanctions is DENIED.

Prior to the hearing responses in substantial compliance were served.

Join ZoomGov Meeting https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1602210102?pwd=emlhR29SczExam56NFFqWHFvSitmZz09

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share