DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0207586·shasta·Civil·Civil
Hearing in about 7 hoursAppearance necessary

WARD, ET AL. VS. LEVINDOFSKE, ET AL.

Trial setting

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
63
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJeff Ward
DefendantLevindofske

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0207586 This matter is on calendar for trial setting. The matter is now at issue as Defendants filed their answer to Plaintiff Jeff Ward’s first amended complaint on September 4, 2026. The Court intends on setting the matter for trial. The parties are ordered to meet and confer prior to the hearing regarding proposed dates for trial. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

YATES VS. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share