DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV485448·santaclara·Civil·Contract
Hearing in 1 dayOFF CALENDAR

Craig Rotbert v. Apele Builder, Inc., et al.

Motion to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Ruling

9:00 26CV485448 Craig Rotbert Order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Deem 4 v. Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, Apele Builder, Inc., et al. Set One (“RFAs”), Admitted by Defendant Manny Borja, Sr.

As trial of this case is set for September 8, 2026—the trial date set at Plaintiff’s request for trial preference (see Order, June 4, 2026)—and as the parties have already attended the Trial Assignment Hearing before Supervising Civil Division Judge Deen on September 3, 2026, where they were ordered to submit the pretrial package (including motions in limine) for the Trial Judge by September 4, 2026, the issues raised by Plaintiff in this Motion must now be presented to and determined by the Trial Judge, to whom this pre-trial Civil Case Manager defers. So this Motion in Department 16 today is OFF CALENDAR.

SO ORDERED.

9:00 20CV371971 Vahe Tashjian Order Sua Sponte CONTINUING 5 v. Plaintiff’s Motion to Release to Planet Home Lending, LLC, Plaintiff the $304,000.00 Bond et al. See Line 5 below for complete tentative ruling sua sponte CONTINUING this Motion to April 28, 2027 at 9:00 AM in Department 16.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

9:00 22CV397444 Swaminathan Nandakumar, Order on Cross-Complainants David 6 et al. Plagens and Linda Plagens’ Motion v. To Enforce Settlement Agreement David Plagens, et al. See Line 6 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

Line 4 Case Name: Craig Rotbert v. Apele Builder, Inc., et al.

Case No.: 26CV485448

See ORDER above. (As trial of the case already started on September 8, 2026—the trial date set at Plaintiff’s request for trial preference (see Order, June 4, 2026)—the issues raised by Plaintiff in this Motion must now be presented to and determined by the Trial Judge, to whom this pre-trial Civil Case Manager defers. So this Motion in Department 16 today is OFF CALENDAR.)

16

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share