DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV480145·santaclara·Civil·Contract
Hearing in 1 dayOFF CALENDER as MOOT

Theo Van Buren v. Bill Holdings Inc., et al.

Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Ruling

9:01 2 9:01 3 9:01 4 9:01 5

9:00 26CV493354 Abel Gonzalez Order on Defendants’ Demurrer to 1 v. Plaintiff’s Complaint Toby Tilford, et al. See Line 1 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

9:00 25CV480145 Theo Van Buren Order on Defendant Milind Nimesh’s 2 v. Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint Bill Holdings Inc., et al. As this entire action has been dismissed at Plaintiff’s request made on September 1, 2026, this Demurrer is OFF CALENDER as MOOT.

And all future hearings in this dismissed action are VACATED.

SO ORDERED.

9:00 25CV478200 Kamila Kraba Order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate 3 v. Void Order, Confirm Entry of Armsby Lane Road Association Default, and Strike Answer and Cross-Complaint

See Line 3 below for complete tentative ruling.

After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal Order.

Line 2 Case Name: Theo Van Buren v. Bill Holdings Inc., et al.

Case No.: 25CV480145

See ORDER above. (As this entire action has been dismissed at Plaintiff’s request made on September 1, 2026, this Demurrer is OFF CALENDER as MOOT. And all future hearings in this dismissed action are VACATED.)

11

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share