DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24612668·sf·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

CHRISTOPHER GUEST VS. YERBA BUENA CENTER FOR ARTS ET AL

Motion to Compel a Further Independent Medical Examination

Hearing date
Aug 8, 2025
Department
302
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffCHRISTOPHER GUEST
DefendantYERBA BUENA CENTER FOR THE ARTS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC24612668 - August 8, 2025 Hearing date: August 8, 2025 Case number: CGC24612668 Case title: CHRISTOPHER GUEST VS. YERBA BUENA CENTER FOR ARTS ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24612668 | Case Title: | | CHRISTOPHER GUEST VS. YERBA BUENA CENTER FOR ARTS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-08 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | YERBA BUEANA CENTER FOR THE ARTS MOTION TO COMPEL A FURTHER INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF CHRISTOPHER GUEST | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Friday, August 8, 2025, Line 11. 1 - YERBA BUEANA CENTER FOR THE ARTS' MOTION TO COMPEL A FURTHER INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF CHRISTOPHER GUEST.

Defendant Yerba Buena Center for the Arts' Motion to Compel a Further Independent Medical Examination is GRANTED. The requests at issue appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (See CCP Section 2017.010.) Plaintiff has put his vision damage/injuries at issue, the exam is to be conducted by a licensed ophthalmologist; the exam will not be painful, the proposed exam, which will not be protracted or intrusive, is reasonable; sufficient notice has been given; and, this exam is not cumulative. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.020; see Shapira v. Superior Court (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 1249, 1254-1256.) Plaintiff has failed to establish the merits of any objections.

Good cause appearing and pursuant to the California Discovery Act, Plaintiff is ordered to submit to an independent medical examination consistent with the specifics set out in Defendant Yerba Buena Center for the Arts' July 15, 2025. Plaintiff shall submit to the IME forthwith but no later than August 20, 2025. Parties must meet and confer regarding the specific date of the IME; in the event of a lack of agreement the IME shall be on August 18, 2025, or the next date the physician is available as determined by the physician.

As was true in connection with the May 30, 20205, motion, the court does not find that Plaintiff's actions in connection with this discovery were substantially justified. Plaintiff shall pay $500 as sanctions, payable to the Clerk of the Court, payment no later than by August 19, 2025, receipt filed in the docket for this action no later than August 26, 2025. (See Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010(a)&(b) & 2023.030.)

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share