DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CVG-02474·shasta·Civil·Contract
Hearing in 3 daysCONTINUED

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. VS. HAM

Review of status

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
64
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 14, 2028
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMidland Credit Management, Inc.
DefendantHam

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CVG-02474 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of the case. Notice of Conditional Settlement was filed on March 2, 2026 indicating the matter would be dismissed no later than July 16, 2028. Plaintiff attempted to dismiss the action on August 13, 2026, but the request was rejected by the clerk due to defects. The matter is continued to Monday, August 14, 2028 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 64 for status of dismissal. The Court intends to dismiss the matter without prejudice on that date per CRC 3.1385 unless good cause is presented. Any good cause must be presented at or before the hearing. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

REGER VS. STEIGER

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share