EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT LLC VS. LIDUVINA DEL PILAR CANTILLO, ET AL.
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIO FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Motion type
Causes of action
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
September 8, 2026 Law and Motion Calendar PAGE 43 Judge: HONORABLE NANCY L. FINEMAN, Department 04 ________________________________________________________________________
2:00 PM LINE 13 26-UDL-00049 EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT LLC VS. LIDUVINA DEL PILAR CANTILLO, ET AL.
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT LLC KIYOSHI DIN LIDUVINA DEL PILAR CANTILLO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIO FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
TENTATIVE RULING:
The court GRANTS Equity Residential Management unopposed motion for entry of judgment pursuant to stipulation. The request for judicial notice is granted. The unopposed motion is granted pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
The parties settled this action wherein defendant agreed to pay plaintiff $13,830.49 as principal plus $2,000 in attorney’s fees and court costs for a total of $15,830.49 as the “Balance.” It further provides that defendant shall make payments of $2,322.05 on April 15, 2026, and April 30, 2026. The parties also agreed that the court would retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.
The declaration of Karen Webster states that defendants did not make the April 2026 payments. Accordingly, the defendant is in breach, and under the settlement agreement, plaintiff is entitled to a judgment of $15,830.49.
According, the dismissal of this action is vacated, and judgment is entered for plaintiff and against defendant Juan Camilo Romero Moissl in the amount of $15,830.49.
If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, counsel for plaintiff shall prepare a written order and proposed judgment consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court.
POSTED: 3:00 PM
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”