DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26FL0386·eldorado·Civil·Property control orders
Hearing 9 days agoDROPPED

ARIAN ANDREA BEHZIZ V. CHRISTOPHER RYAN DAVIS

Request for Order (RFO) seeking property control orders

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffARIAN ANDREA BEHZIZ
DefendantCHRISTOPHER RYAN DAVIS

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 August 27, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM

1. ARIAN ANDREA BEHZIZ V. CHRISTOPHER RYAN DAVIS 26FL0386

On May 29, 2026, Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking property control orders. The RFO was personally served on June 24, 2026, however Petitioner failed to serve the FL-320 and the required Notice of Tentative Ruling.

Respondent has not filed a Responsive Declaration to Request for Order.

This matter is dropped from calendar due to the lack of proper service.

TENTATIVE RULING #1: THIS MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO LACK OF PROPER SERVICE.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share