County of San Francisco v. Justin Keith Feliciano

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,) Case Number: FCS-17-352210) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: September 8, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 JUSTIN KEITH FELICIANO,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: JPT JUDITH E. HARDING) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, CHILD 13 CUSTODY, VISITATION (PARENTING TIME) 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 The parties are ordered to appear. The parties may appear in person in Dept. 403 or remotely by 16 Zoom video. If a party chooses to appear by video, that party must abide by the Notice and 17 Instructions for Remote Appearances in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 18 A.

Procedural History 19 1) The parties to this proceeding are Respondent, Justin Feliciano (Father) and Respondent, Alba 20 Martinez (Mother). The parties have one minor child named Janessa Feliciano (02/11/14). 21 2) On July 29, 2026, Father filed an emergency Request for Order seeking a modification of the 22 existing child custody and visitation orders. The Court granted Father’s request for an order 23 shortening time for service and hearing and set the matter for Readiness on August 10, 2026.

No 24 additional orders were made. 25 3) On August 10, 2026, both parties appeared at the “Readiness” hearing and the parties were 26 referred to FCS Mediation to occur on August 17, 2026 and set a return hearing for September 8, 27 2026. 28 4) On August 17, 2026, the parties attended FCS Mediation and an agreement was not reached.. 29 B. Findings and Order

1 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child 2 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject the party in 3 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual residence of the minor 4 child(ren) is the United States. 5 2) The matter shall be set for an evidentiary hearing. The parties are ordered to appear at the 6 hearing and be prepared to discuss the length of trial, number of witnesses anticipated, and setting 7 of trial date(s). 8 3) In the interim, all existing orders related to child custody and visitation remain in full force and 9 effect. Father shall return the minor child to Mother’s care and custody in Las Vegas, per the 10 existing orders. 11

15

19

23

27

29