DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23607926·sf·Civil·Employment / Corporate Litigation
Hearing about 1 year agoTRANSFERRED to Department 206 on the day of trial (9/8/25) to be heard by the assigned trial judge.

STACY SAAL VS. GLYDWAYS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO Amend Answer To Assert Affirmative Deeense Of Fraudulent Inducement

Hearing date
Aug 15, 2025
Department
302
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 8, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSTACY SAAL
DefendantGLYDWAYS, INC.
DefendantMARK SEEGER
DefendantVINOD KHOSLA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC23607926 - August 15, 2025 Hearing date: August 15, 2025 Case number: CGC23607926 Case title: STACY SAAL VS. GLYDWAYS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23607926 | Case Title: | | STACY SAAL VS. GLYDWAYS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-15 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO Amend Answer To Assert Affirmative Deeense Of Fraudulent Inducement | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Friday, August 15, 2025, Line 4. DEFENDANTs GLYDWAYS, INC., MARK SEEGER, and VINOD KHOSLA's MOTION FOR LEAVE TO Amend Answer To Assert Affirmative Deeense Of Fraudulent Inducement. The motion to amend is TRANSFERRED to Department 206 on the day of trial (9/8/25) to be heard by the assigned trial judge. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share