Buriyev vs. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
Demurrer to Petition for Writ of Mandate
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
not sufficiently allege when the actions alleged occurred for purposes of the statute of limitations.
If Plaintiff chooses to amend, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a red-lined and clean version of the amended pleading.
Clerk to give notice.
Motion to Strike Portions of Complaint
Defendants David Byungik Oh and The Happier Church’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs’ Complaint is GRANTED with 10 days leave to amend.
With respect to Plaintiff’s second cause of action, Plaintiff does not allege sufficient facts to support a request for punitive damages. (See Compl. ¶ 11.)
If Plaintiff chooses to amend, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a red-lined and clean version of the amended pleading.
Clerk to give notice.
9 Buriyev vs. Demurrer to Petition for Writ of Mandate California Vacated – first amended petition was filed. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board 30-2026- 01533151-CU- WM-CJC 10 Burke vs. City of Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Newport Beach Adjudication 30-2024- Defendant City of Newport Beach motion for summary 01436236-CU- judgment or in the alternative summary adjudication PA-CJC GRANTED.
Defendant’s request for judicial notice (“RJN”) is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
Defendant’s evidentiary objections (ROA 172) are OVERRULED.
The court declines to rule on Plaintiff’s objections (ROA 147 & 166) because they are not numbered consecutively. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b); see Hodjat v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1, 9 [court may decline to rule on objections not filed in conformity with formatting rules nor is court required to give party second chance at filing properly formatted objections].) The court also declines to consider objections stated in Plaintiff’s responsive separate statement (ROA 131) because they do not refer
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”